<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clare's blog, aka rantspace &#187; Brethren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/category/brethren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog</link>
	<description>Opportunities to say what I think about current church stuff.  You're welcome to add comments, but please forgive me if I'm very slow to answer them.  Comments are moderated, too, so don't expect them to appear immediately you post them.  Note:This blog is independently accessible at http://www.clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>And speaking of power&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/05/19/and-speaking-of-power/</link>
		<comments>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/05/19/and-speaking-of-power/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 02:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anglican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brethren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Churches and power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kevin Rudd has back-pedalled on his calls for federal agencies to investigate the Brethrens (see story). Now this may be merely a tactical move, allowing him to gather forces to promote such an enquiry at a better time. But it may equally be that Rudd has discovered that Brethren influence is strong enough to stop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Rudd has back-pedalled on his calls for federal agencies to investigate the Brethrens (<a href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2008/05/17/1210765260549.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1" target="new">see story</a>).  Now this may be merely a tactical move, allowing him to gather forces to promote such an enquiry at a better time.  But it may equally be that Rudd has discovered that Brethren influence is strong enough to stop him proceeding.  And such behind-the-scenes, clout-wielding political manoeuvres are not unusual.  Catholics and Anglicans both do it too (how else do you think an archbishop got to be GG??).  But people don&#8217;t raise an eyebrow at that, because they&#8217;ve been around a long time and their beliefs are well-known.  In other words, they&#8217;re &#8220;safe&#8221;.</p>
<p>People get scared about the thought of weirdos wielding power, and with good reason.  But just because a religion (or a denomination) has been around a long time doesn&#8217;t make their high priests any less prone to misuse of power.  Or, indeed, any less weird!</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s no good sitting back and thinking the government will come to our rescue, because they&#8217;re often subject to the power themselves.  It takes ordinary people &#8211; mostly outside the church &#8211; to see, and keep calling attention to, the failings of churches.</p>
<p>***<br />
&lt;sigh&gt; I said this much better at my first attempt, but that version disappeared into the ether.  Don&#8217;t you hate that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/05/19/and-speaking-of-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
