<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Arrogance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/</link>
	<description>Opportunities to say what I think about current church stuff.  You're welcome to add comments, but please forgive me if I'm very slow to answer them.  Comments are moderated, too, so don't expect them to appear immediately you post them.  Note:This blog is independently accessible at http://www.clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/?p=21#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Roarmareads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Roarmareads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare</title>
		<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Clare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/?p=21#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Hi Rachel, nice to meet you too.  I think what concerns me is any religion being used as a hard line.  Religion, by definition, is unprovable (it&#039;s about faith in a non-provable Being), so asserting one&#039;s own interpretation as absolute truth is arrogant, and therefore dangerous.  And it doesn&#039;t matter which religion, or which denomination of a religion, it is who&#039;s saying it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rachel, nice to meet you too.  I think what concerns me is any religion being used as a hard line.  Religion, by definition, is unprovable (it&#8217;s about faith in a non-provable Being), so asserting one&#8217;s own interpretation as absolute truth is arrogant, and therefore dangerous.  And it doesn&#8217;t matter which religion, or which denomination of a religion, it is who&#8217;s saying it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roarmareads</title>
		<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Roarmareads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 10:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/?p=21#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/2008/06/23/arrogance/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 09:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clergyabuseaustralia.org/blog/?p=21#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Hi nice to meet you - I share many of your views, particularly about GAFCON.

Rachel </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi nice to meet you &#8211; I share many of your views, particularly about GAFCON.</p>
<p>Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

